Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-33532122-20180504185447/@comment-2405:204:D400:5E6B:E503:FB4:6324:2110-20180529110659

GBL1111 wrote: 2405:204:D08E:FC6D:E503:FB4:6324:2110 wrote: On the topic of decliners,I believe if you challenge a someone with a set fighters and suddenly change it to very high stat fighterson the third round, he is entitled to a decline. I personally accept those challenges which would give me 2 wins when challenged, the other guy can have 3 and the larger completion bonus. But I have declined all those guys that have changed to a higher stat fighter in the hopes of winning all the remaining fights.

Then you're a decliner and belong on this list. Keep in mind that whoever changed his lineup has many different active challenges, and assuming he's changing his line-up just for you is actually a bit egocentric. Moreover, are you afraid to lose a fight? What a boring, cowardly way to play. What is the point if you are so afraid to lose a fight that you never risk doing so? Finally, mathematically it's stupid. The bonus you get for completing a full set of fights more than makes up for any lack of points from losing. Do the math and stop screwing over other players as well as yourself. Seriously?? I found it more cowardly that you are unwilling to let newer players like me with lower stats gain some points despite you having the lion's share of the total points. For most of us new players who won't necessarily have fighters with class bonus that would mean we are playing for 20 points and completion bonus which is pretty meagre. Also this doesn't mean I dont take fights from players higher stats, it just means that I need to know what I am getting into. I'm not asking for two untrained fighters, just a fair chance. I know the others don't play it for charity but it goes both ways. So what I go by is unless you're willing display your high stats team first up, don't go changing switching out to fully maxed fighters on his turn. Do whatever you want with your turn.