Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-33532122-20180504185447/@comment-109.86.209.227-20180509061414

KO Kid Harry wrote: 109.86.209.227 wrote: Can you please explain. What is the point of accepting a challenge if you have no chance of winning even in a single fight??? .. you are right. there is no point, if you have no chance to win a fight it is unfair ! ... I can understand people if they have not played so long, or have none strong line up or by accidentally .. no time.. whatever, but this list is not made for such persons ... let me ask the question ... where is the point to reject someone if you could win all fights ??? or at least two .. or why do people run of the fifth round though they could win ?? on both sides you have to filter out who the assholes is .. of course there are assholes on both sides ... and the biggest assholes are people who deliberately do it.. on your and on our side 50/50 ...for example .. I pay close attention to who and what a line up I challenge ... .what not everybody does, i try to give everyone a chance with a weak line up.and also try to stay away from to weak players. .sometimes patience helps .. wait for the people, many change their line up ... Ok. Another situation. When I am challenged it's like a given to me that I should win only 2 fights regardless of the lineup of my opponent. But when I challenge somebody I expect to win 3 fights. I think it's a clear and fair sheme, isn't it? Then, you challenge a guy, and you see you can really easy win 3 of 5. He changes his lineup making you able to win only 2 of 5, leaving the last fifth fight unequal and unreal to win. Why the fuck can't I decline the last fight if that asshole plays unfairly??? Am I a decliner in that case?