Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-33532122-20180504185447/@comment-33532122-20180511125940

AnaR47 wrote: Saenchai wrote: AnaR47 wrote: Saenchai wrote:

2601:403:0:7B93:54C3:1157:2915:CA5C wrote: AnaR47 wrote: This faggot I got side tracked by talking shit, but I did have a point about the above image that pertains to this list. Are we now saying that it is wrong to decline people who use game guardian to spam us with challenges? I usually accept all challenges, but in situations where energy is limited, these challenges keep us from finding new fights where we can get the full 3 win bonus. Its also suspicious how the image only shows those 2 declines without the rest of the challenges visible. Maybe that person completed 3 of the 5 challenges they received, but they decided to move on and challenge other people who are not cheating. The way I understood things was that if someone spams you with game guardian, the "do not decline" rule didnt apply. I hope some other long time forum users will reaffirm this idea. I'm basing this off of comments from the majority of the users that have been around for a while. All bullshit aside, if we are putting people on a list for declining, we need to establish the "right" way to deal with game guardian users (cheaters), that overload us with challenges. Game guardian users have always had a well established reputation as selfish players that cannot be trusted. Are we now saying that we owe them the obligation to fight back every single challenge they send us, regardless of the number, without declining any of their challenges? I think thats a good point.

IMO, we don't have the obligation to fight back all spam challenges, and I think that's fair to fight back 1 at least. Sometimes I respond all, but sometimes I respond one and let the rest (of same guy) expire. This really depends on how is my queue. I think that way is fair, because I'm fighting back every player, but not every challenge (in cases of GG users spams).

So if this guy from AnaR47 screenshot accepted one of his challenges, IMO, he doesn't deserve be on the list. But I can't know that, unless AnaR47 tell me.

Again, just my opinion. I don't speak for the community, so don't generalize it. Hey Saenchai, I wasn't sent him million challenges. I sent him just two, and he declined them. This is the case. AnaR47, if you just sent two and he decline both, how you explain this screenshot below?

You posted it in the season 27 thread, it's the same nickname and it's in 5th round already.



Looks like you can't be trusted, sad. And I'm removing his nick of the list, like I said earlier, if he accepted at least one challenge, then he doesn't deserve to be in the list, because no one has the obligation to respond all challenges from a GG user. so if somone just accepted only one challange out of three, that makes him non-decliner?? huh, remove him from this list if u want. i don't care anymore. and i really don't care anymore some of users in this site trusts me or not. i have no obligation to make u believe me guys,bye. Yes, it makes him non-decliner. Simply because you can't send more than 1 challenge to the same player without GG.

After the challenge is completed, you may see the same player again, but not while is active.

Sometimes I only respond to 1 challenge from the same guy and let the rest expire, and imo that doesn't make me a decliner, because I accept everyone, but not every challenge (from GG users).