Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-33113496-20171012181741/@comment-207.244.82.123-20171020002758

BerryBoiii wrote: In general what I consider in a fighter to be called best are;

- How good said fighter is as AI in H2H defending a fight.

- If he/she has a good standup game

-  If he/she g ood ground game (plus guard)

-  If he/she possesses easy  or hard to land abilities( if any then how many? )

- Legendary abilities possessed (if any & how many) plus difficulty level to land it as well as dodge it(as opponent).

Some fighters may have good damage but not dangerous at all in H2H as an AI. Eg Anyone can easily beat NP or CE GSP but compared to IC GSP it ain't easy knowing of the lingering threat of a legendary KO strike that can hit u anytime. Though NP has higher damage but to be frank they're all easy to deal with, same reasoning goes for Liddel,Penn,Conor etc

That's my criterion for picking the best so I don't solely base it on who has more damage but I consider lots of things. I think now it'll be more clear too see how I reason out things Why do you have almost the same opinion as the youtuber Tokyoska TV, on his web page here 'Which fighter is good?' http://www.ufcmobiletips.com/2016/10/GoodFighterInDepth.html. This may be a stupid question but are you him ?