Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-31529160-20171201171711/@comment-32783267-20171212043401

@CanadianOracle and @Armbar

Guys.. we need to move the discussion to the recent event I think.

I see Whittaker as a Bisping 2.0 for some reason as I see Holloway as Penn 2.0 (I might be wrong lol). He's a standup guy with great defence on the ground and he is not from USA or Brazil (Ok I might be grasping the straws.. but you get the point). It would be interesting to see how the Bobby Knuckles Reaper deals with Luke's grappling as in Joe's words, Rockhold is a STUD on the ground.

I appreciate villains too as a Pro Wrestling fan. Heels are usually more entertaining than Faces of course. Bisping is a great heel and it was his schtick since the beginning for example, but I am sick of heels like He Who Shan't Be Named who is ruining his legacy and his wannabes like Cringe Covington..

I was expecting some fireworks with Loma vs Rigo.. but Loma just dismantled Rigo and the way Rigo didn't even bothered to adjust, made me suspect Rigo took a dive... (or maybe he hurted his hands from punching the air or Loma's junk). Anyways, Rigo is smaller and is almost at the end of his career tbh, with no belt on the line for him then I would say he had nothing to lose going into this fight.. except for a tarnished legacy. But his tarnished legacy might fared better than He Who Shan't Be Named's legacy lol.

Boxing nowadays have became too intelligent that many fights matches became stale and fighters most boxers took no risk at all (those guys are clearly athletes :D). I think what makes the good ol' days of Boxing charming is that techniques were far from perfect and boxers are willing to put themselves on the line regardless of how many titles he was holding. It's nice to see polished, razor sharp techniques once in a while but I guess imperfection is what makes things attractive. Peace!