Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-31529160-20170811161845/@comment-32811455-20170812065156

BerryBoiii wrote:

The Max Frankie analogy is funny xD To avoid writing leghty stuff m jst gonna tell u p4p ain't based on size difference with repect to others. It ain't JBJ's fault that his opponents have a size disadvantage in front of him plus we all know in the flyweight division they are all roughly the same size. Just because Jones knows how to use it at his advantage doesn't mean should be p4p. Why can't Struve be the best seeing that size-wise he is a beast n yet still smaller ppl have beaten him.

Outside the octagon he ain't someone to look up to, I know. We're still seeing if he has changed but inside the octagon he finishes anyone his weightclass. You ain't the best just because of ur size but being able to use everything u have at your diposal.

Yeah, like I said JBJ is an awesome fighter -- I'm just arguing over whether he is #1 or #2 P4P at this particular time. If he can do some of the things I mentioned then he'll even get my vote over DJ. You know I don't mean he's all size & reach; just saying if we make that a factor at all in a P4P comparison it costs him.

Stefan Struve is a good example of a guy who seems to have no clue how to use his massive size to his advantage. Plus, he's not half the talent that Jones is, especially in respect to wrestling. He is much slower as well. Struve should study that Jones v DC fight to learn how to use his height and reach. In a way he's like Lesnar: physical gifts aside, not that impressive -- unlike Jones who is impressive without them (just not quite as impressive as DJ). Take away Struve's size and you have a journeyman... in Bellator. :P